Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. J.b.ro...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. J.b.roy

High Court 11 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

11 Oct 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. J.b.roy, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 4[th] October, 2012 Date of Decision : 11[th] October, 2012 + ITA 411/2006 + ITA 413/2006 + ITA 439/2006 + ITA 440/2006 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus J.B.ROY ..... Respondent + ITA 235/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ARA ..... Appellant versus J.B.ROY ..... Respondent + ITA 410/2006 + ITA 436/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus OP SRIVASTAVA ..... Respondent + ITA 238/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL ..... Appellant versus MR.J.B.ROY ..... Respondent Presence : Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing counsel for the appellant. Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Satyen Sethi, and Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advs. for the respondent in ITA No.1114/2005. Mr.Percy J. Pardiwalla, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Satyen Sethi, and Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advs. for the respondent in ITA No.235, 410, 411, 413, 436, 439, 440 & 238/2006. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: For orders see ITA No.1114/2005. (R.V. EASWAR) JUDGE (S. RAVINDRA BHAT) JUDGE OCTOBER 11, 2012 gm

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.