The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jet Airways (India) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Considering the above the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently all the Appeals stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1564 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1563 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1562 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1561 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant
Versus
Jet Airways (India) Ltd............Respondent
Mr. A.D. Kango & Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the
Appellant
Mr. A.K. Jasani, Advocate for Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The question of law as framed in these
Appeals is question "A" on page 4. This question is
covered by the judgment of this Court in the
Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s.Nicholas
Piramal India Ltd., Income Tax Appeal No.432 of 2001
decided on 15th January,2008. Considering the above
the question of law as framed would not arise and
consequently all the Appeals stand dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue