In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. J.p.devadhar, J, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: All the appeals are dismissed in limine withno order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2583 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-tax.... Appellant.V/s.Shri Bhogawati Sahakari SakharKarkhana Ltd.... Respondent.WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2584 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income-tax.... Appellant.V/s.Shri Bhogawati Sahakari SakharKarkhana Ltd.... Respondent.WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2585 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income-tax.... Appellant.V/s.Shri Bhogawati Sahakari SakharKarkhana Ltd.... Respondent.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8th May 2009.P.C. :----.The office objections raised by theregistry are over-ruled.2.Learned counsel appearing for the Revenuefairly states that questions sought to be raised inthese appeals are covered by the judgment of the thisCourt in the case of C.I.T. v. Manjara Shetkari SSKLtd., (2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom) against the Revenue andin favour of the assessee. In this view of the matterno substantial question of law is involved in theseappeals. All the appeals are dismissed in limine withno order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.