In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. J.p.devadhar,Jj. 1St July, 2009, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1915 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Smt.Jyoti H.Mehta
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee i/b.Mr.P.S.Sahadevanfor appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
1.Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
2.Learned Counsel for both the parties submit that the issued raised in all these appeals are squarely covered by the order of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.675of 2008 passed on 10th February, 2009 in the case of CIT Vs. M/s.Growmore Researchand Asset Management Ltd. In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs.
3.Photocopy of the order placed into service is taken on record.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue