In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Juergen Ziegler, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the above appeals stand dismissed for want of substantial question of law, with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.804 OF 2009INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.805 OF 2009INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.812 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
Juergen Ziegler
..Appellant
..Respondent
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.811 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Bernhard Appeltauer Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/b. PDS Legal for respondents.
..Appellant
..Respondent
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 17[th] June,2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Both parties fairly state that the question as framed in the above appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Director of Income Tax(International Taxation) Vs. NGC Network Asia LLC (2009) 222 CTR (Bom) 86.
In this view of the matter, the above appeals stand dismissed for want of substantial question of law, with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue