The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ketan A.shah
High Court
01 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ketan A.shah
Date of order
01 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
1995-96
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ketan A.shah, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine for want of substantial questions of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2389 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Ketan A.Shah
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan a/w. Anuradha Mane for appellant.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Perused the appeal. The Tribunal has relied upon its own order for the A.Y.1995-96 and 1996-97. From the order of the Tribunal, it appears that the said orders were accepted by the Revenue. Today, no material is placed before us to show, that any appeal is pending against the said order at the instance of the Revenue. Under these circumstances, we see no substantial question of law involved in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine for want of substantial questions of law.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue