The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kiran A. Mehta
High Court
09 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kiran A. Mehta
Date of order
09 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kiran A. Mehta, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2747 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1417 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Kiran A. Mehta ... Respondent
Mr. A.D. Kango for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning delay of
602 days in filing the main tax appeal. On perusal
of the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion,
we find that the file was sent to the Law Ministry
for drafting the appeal memo on 15.12.2004 and was
returned back afterabout one year i.e. on
13.12.2005 without a draft appeal. In our view, the
aforesaid period has not been properly explained.
In the circumstances, sufficient cause is not shown
to condone the delay. Hence, Notice of Motion is
dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue