Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.r. S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.r. Steel Union Ltd

High Court 24 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.r. Steel Union Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: On failure to remove the office objections, the appeal stand dismissed for non prosecution without further orders from this court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 712 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 921 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 712 OF 200 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 921 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus K.R. Steel Union Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant. Mr.A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel. . The delay is of 107 days. . Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal subject to appellants removing the office objections, if any within six weeks from today. On failure to remove the office objections, the appeal stand dismissed for non prosecution without further orders from this court. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.