The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd
High Court
11 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd
Date of order
11 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1947 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mrs.Padma Divakar for appellant.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 11TH AUGUST, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
1.The question of law sought to be raised in the appeal relates to the deletion of penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T.Act. The Tribunal has recorded a categorical finding that there was no concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, therefore, no penalty provisions u/s.271(1)(c) is attracted. Apart from this, the assessee has also filed his revised return. So far as the second part of the order, which is not in consonance with the law laid by the Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. Gold Coin Health Food (P) Ltd. 304 ITR 308(SC) is concerned, to that extent, the Tribunal has set aside the order of the CIT(A).
2.In the above view of the matter, the view taken by the Tribunal is a reasonable and possible view. No perversity could be demonstrated by the learned counsel for the appellant in the impugned order. The appeal is without any substance. Hence, the same stands dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.