Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late Shri Sunil Soorma L/H. Neelam

High Court 31 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

31 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late Shri Sunil Soorma L/H. Neelam, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1002 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.284 of 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax....Appellant Vs. Late Shri Sunil Soorma l/h. Neelam Soorma ...Respondent Mr. A.L. Gore, for the Appellant. Mr. N.M. Porwal, for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 31st March, 2009 R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 31st March, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . There is a delay of 326 days in preferring the Appeal. This is a Motion taken out for condonation of delay. 2. Before the Motion could be considered, our attention is also invited in respect of the very same assessee for earlier assessment year being Income Tax Appeal No.263 of 2008, this Court has dismissed the Appeal. 3. Considering the above and even otherwise the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Notice of Motion along with Appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.