The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late Shri Sunil Soorma L/H. Neelam
High Court
31 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late Shri Sunil Soorma L/H. Neelam
Date of order
31 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late Shri Sunil Soorma L/H. Neelam, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence Notice of Motion along with Appeal are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.998 OF 2009
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.590 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax....Appellant
Vs.
Late Shri Sunil Soorma l/h. Neelam
Soorma ...Respondent
Mr. A.L. Gore, for the Appellant.
Mr. N.M. Porwal, for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 31st March, 2009
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 31st March, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 350 days in preferring
the Appeal. This is a Motion taken out for
condonation of delay.
2. Before the Motion could be considered, our
attention is also invited in respect of the very
same assessee for earlier assessment year being
Income Tax Appeal No.263 of 2008, this Court has
dismissed the Appeal.
3. Considering the above and even otherwise the
cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence Notice of Motion along with Appeal are
dismissed.
(-2-)
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue