In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Late) Shri Yash Johar, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the above appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.713 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
(Late) Shri Yash Johar
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 11[th] June,2009
DATE :
Heard learned Counsel for the Revenue.
The issue sought to be raised in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. D.K.Kondke(1991), 96 CTR 161 (Bom) /192 ITR 128, as referred in the order of the Tribunal. In this view of the matter, the above appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue