The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Lml Ltd
High Court
22 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Lml Ltd
Date of order
22 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Lml Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, all the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1552 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.LML Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1429 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.MIRC Electronics Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.V.S.Hadade for respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1434 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.M/s.Instanty Trading and Investment Co. Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1435 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.Blue Niles Holdings Ltd...Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1436 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs.BDA Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1557 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant
Vs.Birla Global Finance Ltd.
..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1558 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Bright Star Investments Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1561 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.First Flight Couriers Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.S.Shekhar for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE :- 22ND JULY, 2009
1.These appeals are barred by limitation. Admittedly, no notices of motion are taken out. There is no prayer for condonation of delay. No sufficient cause is shown. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2.In this view of the matter, all the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.