Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahara...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Maharashtra State Financial Corpn

High Court 18 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

18 Jun 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Maharashtra State Financial Corpn, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. accordingly, the Reference Application stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.32 OF 1992 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Maharashtra State Financial Corpn. ..Applicant ..Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for the Applicant.Mr.Nishant Thakkar i/b. Mulla & Mulla for theRespondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. accordingly, the Reference Application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.