Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahend...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahendra Mehta

High Court 26 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahendra Mehta
Date of order
26 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahendra Mehta, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering the cause shown delay condoned and the impugned order is set aside subject to the Appellant Revenue paying costs, quantified at Rs.5,000/- in favour of the assessee to be paid within four weeks from today.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4396 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.980 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant Vs. Mahendra Mehta ..Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant. Mr. Pankaj R. Toprani, for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . There is a delay of 95_days. Considering the cause shown delay condoned and the impugned order is set aside subject to the Appellant Revenue paying costs, quantified at Rs.5,000/- in favour of the assessee to be paid within four weeks from today. On failure to pay the costs, the Motion to stand dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan