Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Manish...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Manish D.shah

High Court 24 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Manish D.shah
Date of order
24 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Manish D.shah, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ASN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.919 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.433 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Manish D.Shah ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’sorders or directions andRegistrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.J.D. Mistry with A.K. Jasani for theRespondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 24th March,2008. P.C.1. As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00lakhs, the learned counsel seeks leave towithdraw the Motion along with the Appeal.Motion along with Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. 2. The question of law, if any, is kept open for consideration in appropriate case. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan