The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Meera P. Chauhan
High Court
22 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Meera P. Chauhan
Date of order
22 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Meera P. Chauhan, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1874 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1389 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income TaxVersusMeera P. Chauhan
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.Prakash Shah i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard. For the reasons recorded in the affidavit in support of notice of motion, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute.
2.Registry is directed to register the appeal. The office objections are waived. By consent of both the parties, the Appeal is taken up for hearing.
2.Both parties agree that the issue sought ti be raised in this appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s.Narendra D. Desaireported in (2008) 1 DTR Judgments (Bom) 106. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue