In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Metro Exporters Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Reference No. 235 of 1998
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Applicant
vs.
Metro Exporters Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Parag Vyas with Mr.J.S.Saluja for applicant.
Ms.Usha Dalal for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
25th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent very fairly states that the question of law raised in the above reference has already been answered by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of T.N.Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.
Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 260 ITR 82
(SC) against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.
Accordingly the question raised in the above reference is
answered in favour of the revenue and against the
assessee.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.