Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mohit...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mohit Steel Industries (P) Ltd

High Court 13 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mohit Steel Industries (P) Ltd
Date of order
13 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mohit Steel Industries (P) Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA TAX APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2009 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus ... Appellant MOHIT STEEL INDUSTRIES (P) LTD ... Respondent Ms Amira Abdul Razaq for the appellant. -Coram:SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &C. V. BHADANG, JJ.-Date:13th August 2018 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the appellant on written instructionsdated 10/8/2018 received from the appellant and in view of theCircular No.3/2018 dated 11/7/2018 as the tax effect in this appeal is below Rs.50.00 lakhs seeks leave to withdraw thisappeal. 2.�The prayer is accepted. 3.�The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4.� However it is observed that in case the Circular No.03/2018dated 11/7/2018 which is subject matter of challenge before theHon'ble Supreme Court in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in Writ Petition no (Civil) No.851 of 2018 is set aside, it will beopen for the revenue to seek revival of this appeal. hvn C. V. BHADANG, J. SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan