The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Aditya K Rai
High Court
29 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Aditya K Rai
Date of order
29 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Aditya K Rai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1553 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3689 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Mr. Aditya K Rai
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr. S.G. Lakkhani for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 29TH JUNE, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The delay in filing the above appeal is of 6 days. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute.
Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve unserved respondent within four weeks from today.
Hamdast allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D./Speed Post is permitted.
Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the Court.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue