Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mr. B....

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mr. B.m.chatterjee With Mrs. P.p. Bhosale And Mr

High Court 24 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mr. B.m.chatterjee With Mrs. P.p. Bhosale And Mr
Date of order
24 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mr. B.m.chatterjee With Mrs. P.p. Bhosale And Mr, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.933 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.457 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-Tax..Appellant Vs. Smt. Leena B. Shah..............Respondent Mr. B.M.Chatterjee with Mrs. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the respondent. CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. P.C.: P.C.: . There is a delay of 458 days in filing the Appeal. Shri A. Narayanan has filed an affidavit in support of the Motion. The order was received on 20th December, 2004. The file was processed and sent to the Ministry of Law on 24th March, 2005. The file was sent back by the Ministry of law on 13th February, 2006. There is no explanation whatsoever between 24th March, 2005 and 13th February, 2006. Considering the above in our opinion the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion dismissed. (-2-)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan