The Commissioner Of Income Tax … v. Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate
High Court
18 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax … v. Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate
Date of order
18 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax … v. Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 1386 of 2015
In
Tax Appeal No. 26 of 2014
-----
The Commissioner of Income Tax … Appellant
Versus
Late Dr. S.B. Sinha through legal heir Ravi Sinha ….Respondent
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
For the Appellant :
Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate
---------
05/Dated: 2nd July, 2015Oral order:Per D.N. Patel, J.:
1.The present interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condoning the delay of 89 days in
preferring this Tax Appeal.
2.Having heard counsel for the appellant and looking to the reasons
stated in this interlocutory application especially in paragraph nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 thereof, there are reasonable reasons for condoning the delay in preferring this Tax Appeal. We therefore, condone the delay in preferring this Tax Appeal No. 26 of 2014.
3.Accordingly, I.A. No. 1386 of 2015 is allowed and disposed of.
4.Registry is directed to enlist Tax Appeal No. 26 of 2014 under the
heading “For Admission” on 29th July, 2015.
(D.N. Patel, J.)
(Ratnaker Bhengra J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.