Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Ka...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Kaiki J. Khambatta

High Court 12 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Kaiki J. Khambatta
Date of order
12 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Kaiki J. Khambatta, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3572 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1572 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Mr. Kaiki J. Khambatta ... Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . There is delay of 399 days in filing the appeal. The order was received in the office of C.I.T. on 18.6.2004. The Scrutiny report called and submission was on 11.10.2004. The appeal was filed on 18.11.2005. There is no explanation for the delay between 18.6.2004 and 18.11.2005. Considering the same, in our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan