The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mr Loknete Balasaheb Desai
High Court
15 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mr Loknete Balasaheb Desai
Date of order
15 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Mr Loknete Balasaheb Desai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view thereof, the present Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1123 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax .. ..Appellant.
Vs.
Mr Loknete Balasaheb Desai .. ..Respondent.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances,Court ’s :
orders or directions & :
Prothonotary’s orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
Mr Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM :
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the
appellant. None for the respondent.
2. The learned counsel for appellant
states that the question of law raised in this
Appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of
the Division Bench of this Court in the case
of The CIT v. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari
The CIT v. Manjara Shetkari SahakariSakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2008) 301 ITR 191 in
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2008) 301 ITR 191
favour of the assessee and against the
revenue. In view thereof, the present Appeal
stands dismissed.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue