The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Mahesh Bhatt
High Court
09 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Mahesh Bhatt
Date of order
09 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Mahesh Bhatt, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.448 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Mr. Mahesh Bhatt ... Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. The substantial questions of law based on which
the appeal is filed is as set out in Para 5 of the
Appeal Memo. We have perused the questions as
framed. We find that all the questions pertain to
findings of fact recorded by the ITAT. The Question
No. 1 is answered in Para No. 22, question No. 2
is answered in Para No. 31, question No. 3 is also
answered in Para No. 31, question No. 4 is
answered in Para No. 43, question No. 5 is
answered in para No. 49 and question No. 6 is
answered in Para No.61. These being purely findings
of fact, the question of law as framed would not
arise from the said order. Hence, appeal would not
be maintainable. Appeal dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue