The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. P.s.sahadevan With Mr. Vimal Gupta For The
High Court
09 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. P.s.sahadevan With Mr. Vimal Gupta For The
Date of order
09 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. P.s.sahadevan With Mr. Vimal Gupta For The, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Office objections, if any, to be removed within six weeks from today, failing which appeal to stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.265 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2864 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax....Appellant
Vs.
New Heaven Steel Ball Cor.Pvt. Ltd.Respondent
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan with Mr. Vimal Gupta for the
Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 9th February, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 9th February, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Delay condoned subject to the appellant
paying to the respondents costs quantified at
Rs.2,500/- to be paid within six weeks. Office to
register the appeal subject to the payment of costs.
Office objections, if any, to be removed within six
weeks from today, failing which appeal to stand
dismissed for non-prosecution. Liberty to the
respondents to apply for recall of the order in the
event they are not served.
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue