The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Rakesh Sakhsaria
High Court
03 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Rakesh Sakhsaria
Date of order
03 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Rakesh Sakhsaria, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Considering the above, in our opinion, the motion and appeal as filed stands abated and hence, dismissed as abated. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 494 OF 2005
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1366 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Mr. Rakesh Sakhsaria ... Respondent
Mr. A.S. Rao for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: OCTOBER 03, 2007
CORAM: F.I.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 03, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. On behalf of the Revenue, the learned counsel
states that he has been informed that the assessee
has expired some time in the years 2004. Till date,
they have no knowledge of the legal heirs.
Considering the above, in our opinion, the motion
and appeal as filed stands abated and hence,
dismissed as abated.
. We make it clear that it will be open to the
Revenue to apply for setting aside the abatement, if
in law they are entitled to make such an
application.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.