The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Samip Shah
High Court
15 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Samip Shah
Date of order
15 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr. Samip Shah, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1566 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 768 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Mr. Samip Shah ... Respondent
Mr. S.M. Shah for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 15, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. There is delay of 372 days. Affidavit in support
of the motion is filed. We find that the order was
passed on 3.3.2004. The comments of A.O. were
called on 3.3.2004 and the same were received on
21.12.2004. There is also averment that the order
was received on 21.12.2004, which appears to be a
mischief. The appeal was filed on 27.4.2006. In
our opinion, this would not amount to sufficient
cause. Hence, motion dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue