In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.ashok Kotangale, I/B. Pankaj Kapoor For The, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Issue: Learned Counsel for Revenue to find out as to whether the order in Surendra Engineering Corporation Vs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2286 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.889 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.BEC Impex International Pvt.Ltd.Respondents
Mr.Ashok Kotangale, i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the
Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&A.A.SAYED,JJ.DATED: 23RD JULY,2007
CORAM: F.I.
A.A.SAYED
DATED: 23RD JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Considering the cause shown to our mind the
same would amount to sufficient cause. Hence delay
condoned. Office to Register the Appeal. Learned
Counsel for Revenue to find out as to whether the
order in Surendra Engineering Corporation Vs.
ACIT,Mumbai as set out in the order of the ITAT has
been challenged in Appeal.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue