The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.b.m. Chatterjee With Ms. P.p.bhosale I/B
High Court
23 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.b.m. Chatterjee With Ms. P.p.bhosale I/B
Date of order
23 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.b.m. Chatterjee With Ms. P.p.bhosale I/B, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3291 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1294 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Indian Pharma Caps &Chemicals Ltd.Respondent
Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P.Bhosale i/b.
P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&A.A.SAYED,JJ.DATED: 23RD JULY,2007
CORAM: F.I.
A.A.SAYED
DATED: 23RD JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.: . Delay is of 73 days. Considering
P.C.:
the cause shown the same would amount to sufficient
cause. Hence Motion made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal.
2. There is nothing on record to indicate that the Respondents were served. If Respondents were
not served liberty to them to apply for recall of
this order, if aggrieved.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(A.A. SAYED, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue