In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.giridharilal R. Madhyan, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For reasons recorded therein, the issues in the present appeals would not arise and consequently the present appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.430 OF 2001WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.436 OF 2001INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.437 OF 2001INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.438 OF 2001INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.439 OF 2001INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.440 OF 2001INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.441 OF 2001INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.442 OF 2001ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.443 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax.Vs.Mr.Giridharilal R. Madhyan.
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Ms. Aasifa Khan for the Respondent.
..Appellant...Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 22nd January,2008
PC :
1. The issues which arose in these appeals were alsoissues in Income Tax Appeal No.431 of 2001. The saidappeal has been dismissed by a separate order passed byus today. For reasons recorded therein, the issues in
the present appeals would not arise and consequently the
present appeals are dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue