The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.p.j.menezes & Anr
High Court
22 Nov 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.p.j.menezes & Anr
Date of order
22 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.p.j.menezes & Anr, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2005
INTAX APPEAL NO. 15 OF 2002
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
....Applicant
MR.P.J.MENEZES & ANR.
....Respondents
Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. S. M. Singbal, Advocate for the respondent.
P.C.
-Coram:D. D. SINHA &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:22nd November, 2005
Heard Mr. Rivonkar, the learned Counsel for the applicant. Misc.Civil Application No.700/05 is moved by the applicant for condonationof delay in filing the application for bringing the legal representatives ofthe deceased respondent No.1 on record. Mr. Singbal, the learnedCounsel for the respondents No.1(a), 1(c) and 1(j) does not have anyobjection in this regard. In the circumstances, the Misc. CivilApplication is allowed. Appropriate amendment in the cause title becarried out within a period of one week.
With these observations, the misc. civil application is disposed
of.
ssm.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue