In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.ravindra B.devidasani, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2387 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Mr.Ravindra B.Devidasani
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs.Bangalore Clothing Co. 260 ITR 371. In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue