In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Agatha Miranda, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 737 OF 2009INTAX APPEAL NO. 43 OF 2007
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VersusMRS. AGATHA MIRANDA
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Applicants.
P. C.
-Coram:SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:7th December, 2009
Respondent is duly served but none is present. We heard
learned counsel Shri Rivonkar. Application is allowed.
The figures and letters in the last line in the first para of ourOrder dated 21.3.2009 shall be deleted.
Application disposed off.
SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.
MF/-
N. A. BRITTO, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.