Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. M...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Maria C. G. Vaz E Menezes

High Court 09 Jan 2006 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

09 Jan 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Maria C. G. Vaz E Menezes, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 703 OF 2005 INTAX APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2002 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus ....Applicant MRS. MARIA C. G. VAZ E MENEZES & ANR. ....Respondents Shri. S. R. Rivankar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Shivanand Singbal, Advocate For respondent No.1(b), 1(c), 1(j) and1(l). -Coram:R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:9th January, 2006 P.C. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that as per theinstructions received, the person described at serial No.1(1) is not thelegal heir of the deceased respondent No.1 and, therefore, craves leave todelete the name at serial No.1(l). Leave granted. Heard. Considering the facts disclosed in the application, the delay in filing the application for bringing the LRs. on record is condoned. Theapplication is, accordingly, allowed for bringing the LRs. of respondentNo.1 on record. The amendment to be carried out within 14 days. Theapplication, accordingly, stands disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ssm. N. A. BRITTO, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.