Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. M...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Maria C. G. Vaz E Menezes & Anr

High Court 27 Feb 2006 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

27 Feb 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Maria C. G. Vaz E Menezes & Anr, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2006 INTAX APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2002 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus ....Applicant MRS. MARIA C. G. VAZ E MENEZES & ANR. ....Respondents Shri. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the appellant. P.C. -Coram:R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:27th February, 2006 Heard. In fact, the Misc. Civil Application No.703/05 which wasfor condonation of delay in bringing the LRs. and for the purpose of bringing the LRs was allowed on 9.1.06. However, the presentapplication which was filed along with the said application was not listed on the Board and, therefore, remained to be heard. Accordingly, on hearing the matter, it is apparent that there issufficient cause for the delay in filing such application and for the samereasons, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause in the applcation. Accordingly, the abatement of the appeal stands set aside. Application is,accordingly, disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ssm. N. A. BRITTO, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.