Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.sam...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.samip Shah

High Court 09 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.samip Shah
Date of order
09 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr.samip Shah, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1556 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 770 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Mr.Samip Shah ,,, Respondent Mr.S.M. Shah for Appellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: OCTOBER 09, 2007 CORAM: F.I. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 09, 2007 P.C. P.C. . There is delay of 370 days in rpeferring the appeal. The order dated 24.8.2004 was received on 21.12.2004. The consent for filing appeal was granted on 7.4.2005. The last date for filing the appeal was 19.4.2005. The papers were forwarded to Ministry of Law after 13.4.2005. It is contended that after January, 2006 as the Panel counsel refused to take the work of Income Tax Department, the new panel was constituted on January, 2006. The appeal is filed on 27.4.2006. There is no explanation for the period between January, 2006 to 27.4.2006. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. ((-2-)) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan