The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs.rasila S.mehta
High Court
16 Apr 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs.rasila S.mehta
Date of order
16 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs.rasila S.mehta, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: If the Office Objections are not removed within a period of four weeks, the above Appeal will stand dismissed automatically.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3779 OF 2003.ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.514 OF 2000.
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Mrs.Rasila S.Mehta
..Applicant
..Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.B.M.Chatterjee for theApplicant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 16TH APRIL, 2007
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.None appears for the Respondent, though served. Bythe present Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seekingto set aside the order dated 22/08/2000 whereby theProthonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Mumbai haddismissed the above Appeal on the ground of nonremoval of Office Objections. Perused the Notice ofMotion and the affidavit in support thereof. For thereasons stated therein sufficient cause is made outfor setting aside the order dated 22/08/2000. Hence,the order dated 22/08/2000 passed by the Prothonotaryand Senior Master, High Court, Mumbai is set aside andthe Applicant is given four weeks time to remove allOffice Objections. If the Office Objections are not
removed within a period of four weeks, the above
Appeal will stand dismissed automatically.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue