In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs.rinki Bhattacharya, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.697 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
VersusMrs.Rinki Bhattacharya
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 10TH JUNE, 2009
P.C. :1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. On the motion made by the learned counsel for the revenue, he is allowed to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue