Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. 2...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. 20Th Century Finance Corporation

High Court 18 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. 20Th Century Finance Corporation
Date of order
18 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. 20Th Century Finance Corporation, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 303 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 168 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. 20th Century Finance Corporation Ltd. Mumbai. ... Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . There is delay of 475 days. There is affidavit in support of the motion. The order was received by Commissioner of Income Tax - 2 on 16.06.2004. Scrutiny report was called for only on 16.07.2004. The last date of filing the appeal was 13.10.2004. The file was forwarded to the Ministry of law on 29.09.2004. The draft appeal was received on or around on 09.12.2005. The appeal was filed only on 31.01.2006. There is no explanation for the said delay. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed. ((-2-)) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan