The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. 20Th Century Finance Corporation
High Court
18 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. 20Th Century Finance Corporation
Date of order
18 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. 20Th Century Finance Corporation, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 303 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 168 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. 20th Century Finance Corporation
Ltd. Mumbai. ... Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr.
P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is delay of 475 days. There is affidavit
in support of the motion. The order was received by
Commissioner of Income Tax - 2 on 16.06.2004.
Scrutiny report was called for only on 16.07.2004.
The last date of filing the appeal was 13.10.2004.
The file was forwarded to the Ministry of law on
29.09.2004. The draft appeal was received on or
around on 09.12.2005. The appeal was filed only on
31.01.2006. There is no explanation for the said
delay. In our opinion, the cause shown would not
amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion
dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.