Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. A...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Akry Organics Pvt. Ltd

High Court 23 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Akry Organics Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
23 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Akry Organics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Failure on the part of the Appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondents, Appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondents without reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1403 OF 2008INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1405 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.Shri Sudhir S. Mehta ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1402 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.M/s J.M.C. Builder ..Appellant..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr. Anil Mishra for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 457 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.M/s Procter & Gamble Home Products Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Ms. Rupali Karande i/b Rajesh Shah & Oth. for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1429 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1433 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.M/s Atharva Builders Pvt. Ltd. ..RespondentMr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1430 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs.M/s Ifflunik Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1428 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1431 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs. M/s. Akry Organics Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1432 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.Shri Ashok P. Hinduja ..Respondent ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1434 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.M/s Antop Hill Warehousing Co. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1451 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.Shri Bharatkumar K Modi (HUF) ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mrs. Madhavi Tavanandi for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1486 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.N.M. Fashions ..Respondent Mr. K.R. Chaudhary for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1472 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.M/s Leena M. Kabnoorkar ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1460 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.Pancapri Hitec Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1461 OF 2008INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1462 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.M/s Piramal Enterprises Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1495 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.M/s Emtex Industries (I) ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1499 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.M/s Motisons Securities Pvt. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1500 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.M/s Kansan Communications P Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr. K. Gopal for the Respondent. P.C. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 23rd June, 2009 DATE : Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve all unserved respondents within four weeks from today. Hamdast allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D./Speed Post is permitted. Failure on the part of the Appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondents, Appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondents without reference to the Court. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan