Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S A...

The Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S Akshay Software Tachnolo

High Court 04 Sep 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S Akshay Software Tachnolo
Date of order
04 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S Akshay Software Tachnolo, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3309 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1416 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income- Tax .... AppellantMumbai Vs. M/s Akshay Software Tachnolo- .... Respondentgies Ltd. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 P.C. .The delay is less than 200 days.Considering the practical difficulties which theDepartment was facing including referring thematters to the Law Department, Government of Indiafor drafting the Appeal Memo and considering theaffidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, inour opinion, the cause shown would amount tosufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. TheNotice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayerclause (a). 2.Office to register the Appeal. ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan