The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Ampee Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai
High Court
12 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Ampee Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai
Date of order
12 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Ampee Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3124 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1272 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Ampee Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai. Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr.
P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants.
Mr. Ajay R. Singh for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is delay of 427 days. The respondents have
filed affidavit contesting the cause shown by the
appellants. According to appellants the last date
of filing the appeal was 2.8.2004. The CIT granted
approval on 3.8.2004. The appeal was filed on
6.10.2005. Apart from general averments, there is
no explanation for the delay between 3.8.2004 and
6.10.2005. Considering that no specific explanation
offered, cause shown would not amount to sufficient
cause. Hence, motion dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue