The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Art Silk Coop. Ltd
High Court
31 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Art Silk Coop. Ltd
Date of order
31 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Art Silk Coop. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3349 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX (L) NO. 1387 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Art Silk Coop. Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. R.G. Bhat i/by Pankaj Kapoor for Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: JULY 31, 2007
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: JULY 31, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. We have perused the cause shown. There is delay
of 286 days in preferring the appeal. Considering
the cause shown, in our opinion, the same amounts to
sufficient cause. We have also seen the tax
liability. In our opinion, in these circumstances,
the revenue must be given an opportunity of
prosecuting the appeal. Hence, motion made absolute
in terms of Prayer Clause (a). Office to register
the appeal. Appeal tobe placed on board after
registration.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue