Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. A...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Asian Paints (I) Ltd

High Court 15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

15 Jan 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Asian Paints (I) Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 181 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2492 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Asian Paints (I) Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants. Mr. Subhash Shetty for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. P.C. P.C. . There is delay of 241 days in filing the main appeal. There is affidavit in support. Considering the cause shown, the same amounts to sufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.