Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. A...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Atul M. Thakkar

High Court 04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Atul M. Thakkar
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Atul M. Thakkar, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3120 OF 2007 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1887 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant Versus M/s. Atul M. Thakkar ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. F.V. Irani with Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: MARCH 04, 2008 P.C. . There is delay of 190 days in preferring the appeal. . The question of law as framed is as under : "Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT was justified in upholding the order of CIT(A) deleting the addition made as cash credits appearing in the books of account of the assessee, since the assessee failed to discharge the burden of proof placed upon it under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?" . There are two concurrent findings of fact that the burden of proof has been discharged and consequently, the question would not arise. The appeal along with motion disposed of.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan