The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. Vijaykumar And Co
High Court
23 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. Vijaykumar And Co
Date of order
23 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. Vijaykumar And Co, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.1668 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1055 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.M/s. B. Vijaykumar And Co.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan a/w Ms.Padma Divakar for appellant.Mr. S.J. Mehta for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 23[th] June,2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute.
Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
The Tribunal has clearly recorded a finding that the details i.e. purchase bills, copy of ledger account, copy of bank account, copy of income tax returns of the respective parties from whom the material was purchase by the assessee along with the confirmation were filed before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer himself had admitted this fact by recording this fact in his order. The parties are assessed to tax; therefore, the genuineness of these parties could not be doubted. The question arising out of the impugned order revolves around appreciation of evidence and after appreciating the evidence the Tribunal has recorded a clear finding of fact with which no fault can be found. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.