The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bajaj Electricals Ltd
High Court
24 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bajaj Electricals Ltd
Date of order
24 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bajaj Electricals Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 705 OF 2009
ALONG WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3220 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Bajaj Electricals Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is delay of 624 days in preferring the
appeal. Apart from the cause shown which in our
opinion does not amount to sufficient cause, the
question of law as framed in the appeal memo is
nothing but reappreciation of facts. Considering
the same motion does not amount to sufficient cause
and hence, the same is dismissed.
. As the motion is dismissed, appeal also stands
dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue