Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bassien Drugs Ltd

High Court 09 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bassien Drugs Ltd
Date of order
09 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bassien Drugs Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3614 OF 2007ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3614 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1848 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... AppellantVs.M/s Bassien Drugs Ltd.... Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.None for Respondent. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 9TH APRIL, 2008 P.C. :- 1)Heard learned counsel for the appellant.The Motion is filed for condonation of 615 daysdelay in filing the above appeal. Perused theaffidavit filed in support of the Notice ofMotion. The impugned order is dated 27-06-2005.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax grantedapproval on 30-11-2005 for filing the appeal.However, the appeal was filed on 13-08-2007. Thereasons given for the delay in filing the appeal is due to admnistrative exigencies and theprocedural formalities. The reasons given aretotally unsatisfactory. No case is made out forcondoning the delay. Notice of Motion isdismissed with no order as to costs. 2)Notice of Motionis disposed ofaccordingly with no order as to costs. ( DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan