In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bharat Construction, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.900 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.848 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income tax.
..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s. Bharat Construction.
..Respondents.
Mr. B.M.Chatterji with Ms. P.P. Bhosale &P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY,2008.
filing the appeal stands condoned. Office to number the
appeal and list the same for admission.
2. Though we have condoned the delay, the appellant isdirected to remove the office objections, if any, withinfour weeks from today failing which appeal to standdismissed for non prosecution without further referenceto the court.3. It is also made clear that if the respondents haveany grievance relating to non effecting of service of
this notice of motion they are at liberty to apply for
recall of this order.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue